Search for: "Matter of Nadler"
Results 101 - 120
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2013, 7:25 pm
Some information has been redacted because these documents include discussion of matters that continue to be properly classified for national security reasons and the harm to national security would be great if disclosed. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:48 am
On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:34 pm
NADLER: . . . [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:45 pm
Jerry Nadler, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has openly stated that Barr “deserves” to be impeached. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
House Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler issued a letter requesting Special Counsel Mueller’s testimony before his committee by no later than May 23 and subsequently held a press conference to respond to the released report. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(See Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [1st Dept 2009].) [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Words matter. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Why this matters, other than the fact that justice becomes a media sideshow, is that things like the presumption of innocence are tossed aside for ratings or marketing for prosecutors with political ambitions. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
How would the matter be resolved? [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
This is the year of the RFRA, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:00 am
In August of 2019, House Judiciary Committee Chair Jerry Nadler stated on Erin Burnett’s show, OutFront, that his committee was conducting formal impeachment proceedings. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
” Even if the committee achieves total victory on the question of McGahn’s immunity in a matter of months, however, that “victory” would have almost zero chance of justifying Nadler’s optimism. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:50 pm
Goodling is aware of the fact that the Office of Legal Counsel never issued a formal opinion on the matter, and she did not suggest otherwise in her testimony before the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and in the Senate by Sen. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am
Once a committee rules that an act of criminal contempt has occurred, the Speaker of the House or Senate President refers the matter to the appropriate U.S. attorney’s office, “whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:23 pm
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and in the Senate by Sen. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
” Why, then, wait until the last hearing, especially if the House may flip to GOP control in a matter of weeks? [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:14 am
It matters that process is followed, especially when declassifying information—we have witnessed time and time again the fragility of intelligence operations. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:39 am
Chhabria stated that he will issue an opinion on the two party’s summary judgment motions, but indicated the matter was headed for a jury trial. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
House Committee on the Judiciary chairman Jerrold Nadler has long contended that presidential impeachment would be warranted only to defend the republic against a would-be “tyrant. [read post]
