Search for: "Matter of Shell Oil Co." Results 101 - 120 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 9:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Iron Grip Barbell Co., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:09 pm
 The court, however, found that Shell Oil was distinguishable because, unlike Shell Oil, the instant action was not removed from state court; rather, it was initiated in the district court. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Both of these issues, the court concluded, were matters more appropriately left for determination by the executive or legislative branch in the first instance. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091–92 (9th Cir.2010), also recognized this reasoning, stating that it is likely that “Congress intended that the usual and long-standing principles apply ... post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
  Therefore, the court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ claims against the oil companies and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
  Therefore, the court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ claims against the oil companies and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Their lawsuit, a class action claim, targeted a Netherlands firm, Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co., along with one of its subsidiaries, and a British firm, Shell Transport and Trading Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
We consider whether federal courts possess exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over state-based legal malpractice claims that require the application of federal patent law. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:02 am by John McFarland
The Court today issued its opinion in Shell Oil Company v Ross , reversing the judgments of the courts below in favor of Ross for $72,000 in unpaid royalties. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
nco’s refinery, a pollutant classified by the federal government as a group one-carcinogenic toxic substance.3 Once Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) discovered the true extent and levels of Inco’s nickel depositions, Port Colborne became the subject of extreme environmental scrutiny, risk assessments, scientific testing, regulatory intervention, unprecedented media publicity and health studies lasting almost 2 St Lawrence Cement; Imperial Oil Ltd… [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
Shell Oil Company (Docket Report) Aston Martin – Another e-mail discovery ruling: Effectively Illuminated Pathways, LLC v. [read post]