Search for: "Matter of Taylor v City of New York"
Results 101 - 120
of 221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The economic fallout of COVID-19 has caused many municipalities, school districts and BOCES in New York State to consider laying off staff in order to close budget gaps. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:38 am
On January 21, 2011, the City notified the DRFs that the supplemental benefits they received pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-a[2] would be reduced in accordance with the new contract. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
Supreme Court indicated in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, constitutional free speech rights are not implicated when only matters of a personal interest to the individual, in contrast to matters of public concern, are involved.. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
High Court Makes It Easier Podcast (Law 360) AI Regulations Hit New York City Podcast (Ryan Kurtz) Runaway Juries in Employment Litigation Podcast (Anthony Oncidi) Is L&E Arbitration the Answer? [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
The seminal case in New York Stateregarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:13 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900 (2nd Dept 1979), affirmed 49 NY2d 747 (1980). [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:31 am
Responsibility for granting tenure may not be surrendered Croman v City University of New York, App. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Plaintiff submits that the matter before the Court is a case of first impression in the State of New York. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
In Kiobel, the Court further held that a company’s “mere corporate presence” (e.g., being listed on the NYSE or having a public relations office in New York City) was insufficient to overcome the presumption against extraterritoriality. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:18 am
The Cohoes and Monroe cases offer some of the clearest judicial views on the administrative processing of GML Section 207-a/207-c matters involving light duty. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
" Wilson v City of New York, 294 AD2d 290, 292-293 (1st Dept 2002). [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
’“In the words of the Court of Appeals:"Our conclusion that appellants must submit medical evidence contesting the City's physician's findings in order to trigger a hearing is also supported by the holdings, in other contexts, that due process does not require a hearing on a claimed invasion of a property or liberty interest in governmental employment, until the employee has raised a genuine dispute on operative facts (see, Codd v Velger, 429 US 624, 627;… [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Click the button below to pay your registration fee with your credit card via PayPal: As the Appellate noted in Brady v New York County Dist. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A party to a stipulation of settlement cannot withdraw from the stipulation on the basis that it had "improvidently"agreed to itState of New York v Public Employment. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c disability benefitsGamma v Bloom, 274 AD2d 14In Gamma, the Appellate Division concluded that an agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law can set out the controlling procedures for resolving disputes concerning Section 207-c benefits, including resolving any dispute concerning light duty assignments and the continuation of such benefits through arbitration.City of Newburgh police officer Stephen J. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Submitted by: Theodore Pollack, Senior Law Librarian, New York County Public Access Law Library. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
Citing Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
New York Probate Lawyers said that in Matter of Whitcher the decedent's will was probated in March, 1924. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The New York Times and Politico petitioned Howell to unseal portions of the grand jury proceedings in October, citing the historic nature of the secret rulings she had issued. [read post]
