Search for: "Matter of US Steel Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
And given the subject matter of Ingenuity 13’s accusations and the economics of defending such a lawsuit, it is highly likely that the subscriber would immediately pay a settlement demand—regardless whether the subscriber is the actual infringer. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
But even giving the widest berth to the Corps' compelling interest in enforcing its grooming and appearance policies generally, RFRA requires us to ask t [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:14 am by Don Asher
(Indianapolis) United States Steel Corp., Gary Works (Gary). [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am by Kathy Kreps
United States Steel Corp., an Indiana court found a co-worker’s Confederate flag tattoo “was not sufficiently severe and pervasive to establish a hostile work environment. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 4:14 am
Consolidated Edison Corp., 488 F.3d 586, 593 (2d Cir. 2007), id., at *3-*5, “which read Steiner as being limited to ‘workplace dangers that transcend ordinary risks,’” id., at *4. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
These conclusions about Steele enabled the majority to bypass Steele’s “effects test” (versions of which lower courts had developed in the intervening 70+ years) for determining Lanham Act extraterritoriality, without explicitly overruling Steele. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
The employee was fired from her job with a steel production company after she tested positive for marijuana use and failed a random drug test in violation of the company’s drug policy. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
A key to his reasoning may be found in his earlier opinion in Cuno Engineering Corp. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm by Seth Kreimer
But a decade after the enactment of the RLA, on December 18 1944, in Steele v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
See AK Steel Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 11:17 am by Matt C. Bailey
   Slip Opinion, at 26.It is important to underscore that disregard of the plaintiff’s theory of liability is a common certification error in the wage and hour context, spurred in many instances by an employer’s strategic practice of using employee declaration testimony to distract the court’s focus away from the uniform employment policies on which the theory of liability is based:United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Mfg. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:51 am
Steel Rods Transformed Into Screws & Bolts 27. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
A court’s authority to compel arbitration under the Act does not extend to all private contracts, no matter how emphatically they may express a preference for arbitration. [read post]