Search for: "May v. Exxon Corporation" Results 101 - 120 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by dcassuto
To wit: SHELBY PROIE; KAREN MUNRO;                              Case #3:11-05955-BHS PATRICIA SYKES; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, a non-profit corporation; and PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC., a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
LLC),[5] and the other in the District of Columbia Circuit (see Judge Rogers in Doe v Exxon).[6] Both of these opinions support corporate liability under the ATS and likewise reflect the reasoning of Murray, Kinley and Pitts that the rumours of the death of corporate liability under the ATS are greatly exaggerated. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434, 857 N.E.2d 1114, 824 N.Y.S.2d 584 (2006); Exxon Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:08 am by Matthew Nelson
  One corporate attorney framed the issue by providing specific details about costs associated with preserving data for different cases. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
" Exxon Research & Eng'g Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson It's likely old news to most OJ readers, but we should still note in passing that the DC Circuit, in a divided panel, handed down an important ATS case, John Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:05 am by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Also, Bowoto v Chevron Oil, September 10, 2010 the 9th Circuit excluded corporations from the Torture Victims Protection Act. . [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:50 am
One thing is for sure---Exxon Mobil and other large corporations that cause environmental damage in Maryland can afford to pay punitive damage awards. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
1) The Conglomerate: Should Securities Law Folks Care About Wal-Mart v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Amicus brief of Altera Corporation et al.CVSG Information:Invited: December 13, 2010Filed: May 17, 2011 (Deny) Title: Wetherill v. [read post]