Search for: "May v. McKee"
Results 101 - 120
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Nicholas Krob is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the Litigation Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Ag Supply v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Polyvore https://t.co/IlK6GwwoZe -> Twitter May Be Liable for Sending Texts to Recycled Cellphone Numbers–Nunes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:00 am
Excerpt: Introduction and sections II and V | Footnotes omitted. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
They may be cited, however, for persuasive value under Fed.R.App.P. 32.1 and 10th Cir.R. 32.1. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
In another article Greenslade examines Dacre’s coming out in support of Theresa May, with the front page headline of ‘A party in flames and why it must be Theresa May. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:06 am
The rationale for this was noted in McKee v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
The case before the Court, Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
In contrast, if the probationer has not yet completed his or her minimum period probation, he or she is entitled to “notice and hearing” as a condition precedent to termination on the theory that the individual is entitled to a minimum period of service to demonstrate his or her ability to satisfactorily perform the duties of the position [see McKee v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:55 am
Basically, they are: 1) the statutory law exception of Scolaro v Ohio University; 2) a lease or other contract may create a duty/obligation to remove ice and snow; 3) if you undertake to remove snow/ice, you can be held liable if you do so negligently, or in a way that makes the area more hazardous than it had been without your efforts at snow removal; and 4) you may be held liable for unnatural accumulations of ice which result, for example from the negligent design of a… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:55 am
So held the Eight Circuit in SBC Advanced Solutions v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
This would result in the individual having attained "instant tenure" in the position in view of the fact that case law provides that a probationary employee is entitled to "notice and hearing" in the event the appointing authority wishes to terminate the individual during his or her minimum period of probation [see McKee v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
This would result in the individual having attained "instant tenure" in the position in view of the fact that case law provides that a probationary employee is entitled to "notice and hearing" in the event the appointing authority wishes to terminate the individual during his or her minimum period of probation [see McKee v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:09 pm
McKee, 943 S.W.2d 455, 459 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
See McKee v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
See McKee v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
See McKee v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
” In Brinkman v. [read post]
