Search for: "Mc v. Mc" Results 101 - 120 of 644
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2017, 2:19 am
Introduced a few days ago, the Copyright Amendment (Service Providers) Bill proposes to extend the existing – quite narrow – safe harbour regime in the Copyright Act (Part V – Div 2AA) for carriage service providers (defined narrowly in the Telecommunications Act 1997) to the disability, education, library, archive and cultural sectors. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:56 am by Jim Gerl
Eighth Circuit: IZM v Roesmount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public Schs, Independent Sch Dist No 1 70 IDELR 86 (8th Cir 7/14/17) Eighth Circuit ruled that a state statute regarding Braille instruction did not raise the bar for FAPE. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Televicentro of Puerto Rico El Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico autorizó mediante su Resolución MC-2017-290 del 20 de julio de 2017 la cobertura electrónica de los procesos judiciales del caso El Pueblo de Puerto Rico V. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:51 am by Joy Waltemath
., LLC, and Two Pic MC LLC (Disney companies), providing a total of more than $150 million to the common fund for class members, were found to be “fair, reasonable, and adequate” (Nitsch v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
This would be so because in all the cases examined by the CJEU and unlike Break Media, the providers at issue, eg Telekabel (internet access provider) and Mc Fadden, provided a merely technical service. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:30 pm
Tibbie McIntyre reports on The 1709 Blog on a number of items, including the declaration of fair use filed by the Andy Warhol estate against Lynn Goldsmith regarding Warhol’s Prince Series; the settlement reached by singer Ed Sheeran and songwriters Martin Harrington and Thomas Leonard in connection with the song ‘Photograph’; the case Mavrix Photographs v LiveJournal, No. 14-56596, which considered whether the safe harbor defense applies to moderators who review… [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
 Arnold J noted that although the General Court talked about the prefix of Mc- having acquired its own distinctive character, that prefix was not descriptive of the goods or services. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]