Search for: "McCall v. McCall"
Results 101 - 120
of 231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Staples, 15 S.W.3d at 89; McCall v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
Thus, citing McCall v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 3:03 am
McCall, R. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
In the years after the Court of Appeals decision in Stith three of the four Appellate Departments have issued rulings counter to the Stith holding, concluding that because it is the defendant's initial burden to establish standing, the People may raise defendant's lack of standing for the first time on appeal (see People v McCall, 51 AD3d 822, 822 [2d Dept 2008] lv denied 11 NY3d 856 [2008]; People v Hooper, 245 AD2d 1020, 1021 [4th Dept 1997]; People v… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
Stat. 766.118 - presently under challenge in Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
Gore v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
McCall, 913 S.W.2d at 153; Bradshaw v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:43 am
That settlement was set aside in the wake of post-settlement statements by the CFTC and two of its commissioners, the defendants’ motion for contempt and sanctions, and a subsequent appeal to the Seventh Circuit (CFTC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
Both rulings cite precedent set by the Florida’s Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in McCall v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:14 pm
The case of Pinnacle Properties Development Group, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 6:13 am
Kalitan in 2017 and Estate of McCall v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:57 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” (quoting McCall v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
Recent reports by Variety and by the Associated Press underscore the potential importance of the class action brought by Tanya Andersen against the RIAA, the record companies, Media Sentry and others, Andersen v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case, “McCall v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
The case, “McCall v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
McCall v. [read post]
Applying for accidental disability retirement and performance of duty disability retirement benefits
22 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
" Noting that Petitioner did not file her application for accidental disability retirement benefits within these time limits, the court ruled that neither her receipt of workers' compensation benefits nor the check she received for accrued vacation time qualifies as payments "on the payroll" for purposes of the statute, citing Matter of Schwartz v McCall, 300 AD2d 887.Accordingly, the Appellate Division held that the Retirement Systems determination “that… [read post]
