Search for: "Michael L. Lynch"
Results 101 - 120
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[IA-1] - 7/12/2007 Rep Capuano, Michael E. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Bosia, Political Science, Saint Michael's CollegeBret Boyce, University of Detroit Mercy School of LawRebecca M. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:47 am
http://t.co/GoEcyp6 (David Carr) Court Upholds Sanctions against “International Man of Mystery” – http://tinyurl.com/3te5tav (K&L Gates) Discovery Is Discovery: Does the Letter “E” Change Everything? [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
KPMG’ Order Highlights Preservation Burdens - bit.ly/rZdOj8 (Christopher Boehning, Daniel Toal) Sanctions Ordered for Failure to Adequately “Preserve, Search and Collect Potentially Relevant Information” - bit.ly/t3yZay (K&L Gates) Secrets of Search – Part One | E-Discovery Team - bit.ly/vNeqoK (Ralph Losey) Should Freedom of Information Requests Extend to Technology and Software Systems? [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:47 am
http://t.co/GoEcyp6 (David Carr) Court Upholds Sanctions against “International Man of Mystery” – http://tinyurl.com/3te5tav (K&L Gates) Discovery Is Discovery: Does the Letter “E” Change Everything? [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
L. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:18 am
Lynch report for Reuters. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:33 am
Final update 1:03 pm——————Without creating any new constitutional right for gays and lesbians to get married, the First Circuit Court on Thursday ruled that Congress did not have the power to intrude on the choice of states — like Massachusetts — to create such a right under state law. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 6:55 am
On Feb. 6,.Michael Lynch, Sen. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 1:52 pm
I should perhaps also note that, unlike Michael J. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:39 am
http://j.mp/edop8p (Jennifer Lynch) Seven Steps to eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/b8HyWs (Orange Legal Technologies) Staying Afloat In The Sea Of Data: Managing Your Information Risk (PDF) – http://tinyurl.com/ecmconnection (Bob Tennant) The Ups and Downs of US eDiscovery Sanctions - http://bit.ly/hCAvPy (Chris Dale) Top 10 Predictions for eDiscovery in 2011 – http://tinyurl.com/4hgyvvc (Herb Roitblat) Twitter, Bribery and 37 Corporate Counsel in a Big Virtual Bar -… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
., 814 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1987)(per curiam) Bendectin cases Lynch v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:54 am
” (See also Michael Matheson’s essay at Just Security.) [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
., “Enhancing the ecological risk assessment process,” 4 Integrated Envt’l Assess. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
., and remanded the question to the District Court.[20] Characterizing Hoskins as “a close and difficult case,”[21] Judge Lynch in his concurrence counsels “special caution in applying normal principles of accessorial liability when Congress has delineated the particular circumstances in which the [FCPA] applies abroad,”[22] but also questions whether as “a matter of policy” people like Hoskins—a foreign national who was “part of the… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
bit.ly/rIcwYX (Greg Buckles) Court Finds Costs Related to Database “Used as Means of Document Production” are Taxable but Reverses Award in Light of Cost Sharing Agreement - bit.ly/vCiyNI (K&L Gates) Crowdsourcing Legal Data: Are We All eDiscovery Agents Now? [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
” In The Wall Street Journal, Dave Michaels and Brent Kendall report that the “decision adds to the setbacks dealt to SEC enforcers by the high court. [read post]
