Search for: "Michael P Burke"
Results 101 - 120
of 229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 1:21 pm
Burke, Jr. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:14 pm
Burke, Jr. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
Finley and Michael D. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:15 pm
Burke, Jr. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
The elevation of the single inventor to the position of sole creator at best exaggerates his influence over events ... . n34 [p. 347] Stressing his point one final time, Burke reminds his readers that "no inventor works alone. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:17 pm
Rev. 2002) by Professor Michael Carrier (Rutgers Law), which seems to be the most-cited article to tackle the topic in the past decade.As Carrier notes, patents and antitrust present a paradox because patent laws offer the right to exclude, while antitrust laws sometimes condemn such exclusion. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:24 am
Burke, dissented. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Jessica Y. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:29 pm
Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm
Justice Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:14 pm
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:02 am
Burke specially concurring, with J. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Flaherty, Fordham Law SchoolGeorge P. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
Winton International Criminal Justice Review, Volume 20, Number 4, December 2010, p.453-454 Review Essay—The Arc of Triumph and the Agony of Defeat: Mexican Americans and the Law Reviewed by Michael A. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:58 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:42 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:39 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
