Search for: "Microsoft Corporation et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 2:07 pm
WikiLeaks’ antitrust claim against Mastercard et al. is much different. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:11 am
Amazon.Com, Inc., et. al. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
Nokia, et al. 08-293, E.D. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
SAP America, Inc., et. al. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:13 am
[Brief of Trading Technologies, et al.] [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Google Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Penney Corporation, Inc. et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am
City of San Jose (Microsoft Corporation, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Brief for the New York Intellectual Property Law Association Brief for Microsoft Corporation, EMC Corporation, and Intel Corporation Brief for Association Internationale Pour La Protection De La Propriété Intellectuelle et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am
International Business Machines Corporation, et. al. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
BigMachines, Inc., et. al. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:33 am
(Keith Blackman et al., Bracewell LLP). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Microsoft Corporation, et. al. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:13 pm
Lemley acknowleges Mallun Yen [chief patent counsel of Cisco].Lemley's conclusions are favorable to IT companies such as Microsoft.A comment on Techdirt observed:Jaffe, Lemley and Lerner are shills for Microsoft, et al...As below, Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
CalPERS, et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:14 pm
Merrill et al. eds. 2004).n3 Federal Trade Comm'n, To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy, ch. 5, at 31 (2003), available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/10/innovation rpt.pdf.Of greater interest was Chisum's text:I, for one, was skeptical that these types of studies would give enough "push" to patent law reform to overcome the inertia. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Kleinke observes: [Disruptive innovation expert Clayton Christensen et al.] claim that consumers will happily compile and circulate their health risk assessment scores in search of a good health insurance deal, adjusting their risk behavior in real time to changes in their premiums in an unfettered marketplace where payers reward full disclosure and everyone assembles and shares their online personal health record with their employer.Who is going to make all of this happen? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:46 am
Microsoft Corporation, et al. (05/29/2007): appeal of summary judgment of noninfringement (literal or under doctrine of equivalents) and that the patents-in-suit were invalid based on public use and obviousness (affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part); discussion of two patents related to ergonomic input devices (U.S. [read post]
