Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Although Czimmer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Five Justices join or express their agreement with the portion of the “Alito” opinion concluding that the long-term monitoring of a GPS device violates a reasonable expectation of privacy; four Justices (those in the majority, minus Sotomayor) leave that question open. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 pm
SeeFussman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Duggan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
United States, 31 Fed. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:26 am
Those are the three dozen states (one of which--the District of Columbia--is a state for all practical intents and purposes here, though formally it doesn't enjoy statehood) suing Google in parallel case, minus California, which filed a separate brief (next bullet point). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:09 am
LP v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 10:09 am
LP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 5:39 pm
(As the Court stated in Kerr [v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Our poston Yates v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:32 am
LITTLE V. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Morgan State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:54 pm
This part of the University of Utah v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
” Simcox, 511 F.3d at 607−08. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
− suggests that federal due process rights likely constrain an interpretation that transforms a run‐of‐the‐mill registration and appointment statute into a corporate “consent” − perhaps unwitting − to the exercise of general jurisdiction by state courts.Brown, slip op. at 42. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:27 pm
Stack v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:36 am
In Primo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
” Gertz v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Just about every place else – Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, West Virginia − where state attorney generals (or more likely no-bid, contingent fee lawyers purporting to exercise state power on their behalf) have sought (and sometimes obtained) huge verdicts through endless multiplication of statutory penalties, state appellate courts have stepped in to restore sanity. [read post]
