Search for: "Moore v. District of Columbia" Results 101 - 120 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 9:39 pm
Teles brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the Board’s decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 4:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Footnote: See District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
(collectively, “CLS”) by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia holding that certain claims of Alice’s U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick, Aikens and Black LJJ) will give judgment in the libel costs case of Henry v NGN. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The high Court’s two leading Second Amendment cases—District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
The important exception is the Seventh Circuit panel's decision in Moore v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am by SHG
” This conclusion was reaffirmed by the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
The other case cited by the epidemiology chapter was the District of Columbia Circuit’s review of an EPA risk assessment of second-hand smoke. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
District courts in the Northern District of California and District of the District of Columbia have rejected a settlement negotiation privilege, while the Southern District of California and Eastern District of Texas have adopted the privilege in some regard. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:07 am by Mike Scarcella
District Court for the District of Columbia on charges he participated in a bribery conspiracy. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Media Standards Trust director and campaign co-founder Martin Moore argued that the Leveson Inquiry “urgently needs to break open the Motorman files – not least because they might reveal how phone hacking really worked” in a post here. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]