Search for: "N. LILLY"
Results 101 - 120
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:32 am
Medrad, Inc., 358 F.3d 898, 909 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:39 am
., 358 F.3d 898, 909 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am
., 358 F.3d 898, 909 n.2 (Fed. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
See Warner--Jenkinson, 520 U.S. at 39 n. 8 ("[I]f a theory of equivalence would entirely vitiate a particular claim element, partial or complete judgment should be rendered by the court."); see also Mirror Worlds, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 420 A.2d 1305, 1320 (N.J. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
It only makes it plausible that N-terminal antibodies will be effective. [read post]
15 May 2013, 9:09 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1349 (Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 10:00 pm
., (S&N) Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) for criminal FCPA violations, the Oracle SEC Complaint for books and records violations and the Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) SEC Compliant for books and records violations. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm
., 647 F.3d 291, 328 n.15 (6th Cir. 2011 (quoting and following Combs); Kurczi v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:43 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 577 F. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm
., (S&N) Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) for criminal FCPA violations, the Oracle SEC Complaint for books and records violations and the Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly) SEC Compliant for books and records violations. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Why, straight to that old saw, the purported “presumption against preemption”:In considering whether these claims are preempted by the FDCA, some deference to state law is appropriate: “[I]n all preemption cases, and particularly in those in which Congress has legislated in a field which the States have traditionally occupied, we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be superseded by the Federal Act unless that was… [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 2012 WL 1893551, at *3 (D. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 2012 WL 6681895 (Mag. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:50 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
From Justice Guzman’s majority opinion: [I]n 2009, Congress enacted the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (Ledbetter Act), amending Title VII to provide that a discriminatory pay decision occurs each time a paycheck is received and not just when an initial salary decision is made.3 Thus, when a claimant files a discriminatory pay claim under federal law, the 180-day limitations period begins each time a claimant receives a paycheck containing a discriminatory amount. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:31 pm
LEXIS 117238 (N. [read post]
