Search for: "Nestle Chocolate " Results 101 - 120 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 11:15 am by ipandentertainmentlaw
The color, better known as Pantone 2685C, is the distinctive purple used by Cadbury to wrap its milk chocolate candy since WWI. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:03 am by war
Initially, at least, it gave chocolates away branded with the trade mark and a device to promote its business. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:49 am
Mr Justice Arnold's referral to the CJEU of certain questions regarding the application of the Trade Mark Directive in the dispute between Nestlé and Cadbury over Nestlé's application for a trade mark in the shape of its "KitKat" chocolate bar has already been the subject of a number of posts on IPKat (Will Kit Kat shape monopoly last forever? [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 12:59 am by Jani Ihalainen
The bars comprise four individual chocolate wafer fingers connected to each other with a solid chocolate base. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:02 am
Nestlé Canada Inc., that “settlement privilege” does not trump the Crown’s disclosure obligations in a criminal prosecution against another party. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Flour is used in candies such as licorice, KitKats, and Nestle’s Crunch. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Nestlé now owns the Willy Wonka Candy Factory and manufactures chocolates and sweets inspired by Roald Dahl’s creations. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 12:34 am by Steve Baird
DeMet’s apparently purchased the U.S. brand and trademark in 2007 from Nestle, and Nestle appears to have retained the trademark rights elsewhere. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
“Stop Saying ‘Powwow’ for Meeting: CMG Adds Language Policy to Outside Counsel Guidelines” — “Nestled alongside the run-of-the-mill policies outlined in Cox Media Group Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 2:17 am by Caroline Ncube
In South Africa, Nestle has been embroiled in a trademark dispute with IFFCO over its Kit Kat brand. [read post]
Nestlé had failed to cancel the opposed trademark before the Institute for Intellectual Property (IPI) and appealed the case to the BVGer. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:53 am
These two feuding chocolate makers never seem to take a break from litigation, so this KitKat won’t be surprised if an appeal from the refusal to amend the mark soon follows. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The onus would be on Nestle to show that the shape of the chocolate bar, regardless of the inclusion of the words "Kit Kat", would be indicative of the source of the bar by itself (i.e. a distinctive feature). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
The plaintiffs contend that Nestlé USA and Cargill, both U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:38 am
Lawrence Allen was himself an executive with both Hershey and Nestle and he clearly knows whereof he speaks in describing who among the Chocolate titans did well and why. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 4:53 am
On the other side, Nestlé owns KIT KAT trademarks registered for “wafer fingers in milk chocolate” first used in 1949. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
At the very end of August, this weblog hosted a guest comment by a German attorney, Thomas Farkas, in which he gave a strikingly positive slant to the deeper meaning of Advocate General Wathelet's Opinion in the controversial Nestlé v Cadbury dispute over registration of the three-dimensional shape of the Nestlé Kit Kat chocolate biscuit bar. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:38 pm
On the other side, Nestlé owns KIT KAT trade marks registered for “wafer fingers in milk chocolate” first used in 1949. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 5:16 am by José Guillermo
Ambos textos defienden con uñas y dientes a la empresa Nestle y con ella a todas las que producen golosinas. [read post]