Search for: "Nichols v. Backes" Results 101 - 120 of 196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
While the Court of Appeal in BCA v Singh had regarded it as an open question whether Reynolds applies to opinion, Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse had said in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) that the expression of opinion was protected, if at all by, by fair comment. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
ZDNet's Steven Vaughan-Nichols, who likes open source far better than patents, thinks the PAI is, for the time being, "foggy on the details".It's not purely a coincidence that Apple would take a more active role than ever before in patent policy during the opening week of the Apple v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:47 pm
She brought them back to Maywood, and defendant put them in a garage. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
  These were two back-to-back, six month lettings, each at a rental of £3,300 per calendar month. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by Adam Thierer
More Platforms, More Taxes McChesney and Nichols don’t go into a lot of detail about their tax proposals, but the consumer electronics tax they favor appears to be based on the 1967 Carnegie Commission Report, which called for a 5% tax on all new television purchases—a variant on Britain’s annual licensing fee. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Susan Brenner
"Hours after" the jury convicted Villar on all charges, his defense attorney went back to his office and received an email entitled "`Juror No. 66.'" U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6086, involves a long-brewing nondelegation question regarding the federal Sex Offender Notification and Registration Act that the court passed on back in 2015 when it granted cert on another SORNA question in Nichols v. [read post]