Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 3:03 am
Bollinger in 2003, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, in her majority opinion, raised two difficult questions. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
And that Justice O’Connor’s reference in Grutter in 2003 that affirmative action would not be necessary 25 years later was not in any way the holding of that case. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
In her opinion for the majority in that case, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor reaffirmed that “student body diversity is a compelling state interest that can justify the use of race in university admissions,” but she warned that race-conscious admissions policies should not last forever. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Justice Thomas writes: "The Court’s opinion rightly makes clear that Grutter [v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
This bibliography comprises scholarly books, book chapters, and journal articles published or accepted for publication by full-time, emeritus, and retired faculty of the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law between April 1, 2023 and June 30, 2023. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
O’Connor-Ratcliff (from the 9th Circuit) and Lindke v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:59 am
However, in her opinion with the majority, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor stated that she “expects that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
Rehnquist unequivocally stated to Justice O’Connor that the Equal Protection clause prohibited discrimination in the basis of race. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 7:39 am
Gore files: that the Article II (independent state legislature theory) emanated from Justice O’Connor, not Chief Justice Rehnquist, and that Justice O’Connor… Continue reading The post Justice Stevens (or Someone Else) Drafted a Proposed Remand Order in Bush v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:01 am
O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:14 am
Washburn and Derrick Beetso Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona... [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:00 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State), Political Polarization, Legal Education, and a Few Modest but Serious Proposals: Twenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
(In this respect, Justice O’Connor in B v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Justice Brennan promised to obey the Constitution in his Court rulings, not his religious faith, which guided his personal life but not the country’s.Following O’Connor’s appointment by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, eight of the nine appointees by Republican Presidents until today have been conservative Roman Catholics. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
The court wound up taking both the case brought by two school board members, O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
White (Arizona State University (ASU), Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law; Center for Public Health Law and Policy) has posted Overcoming the Major Questions Doctrine with Federal Public Health Authorities (Harvard Law & Policy Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:23 pm
The second case, O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
