Search for: "OM, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ct. at 2128 (recognizing that "[s]ome modicum of [*29] uncertainty" may be tolerated). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
OMS Investments Inc., 94 U.S.P.Q.2d 1031, 1039 (T.T.A.B. 2010). [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
OM 17-02 (Model Brief Regarding Intermittent and Partial Strikes) (Regions should submit cases involving intermittent strikes to Advice). [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 8:54 am
  But then it goes on to cite at length Network Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
OMS Invs., Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1031, 1040 (TTAB 2010)]. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  And this Restatement itself acknowledges that ‘[s]ome courts follow the contrary rule. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  And this Restatement itself acknowledges that ‘[s]ome courts follow the contrary rule. [read post]
., 369 NLRB No. 5 (2020) (distinguishing earlier Board Cases and finding the offer of significantly more backpay than is owed in return for a waiver of reinstatement lawful); Cases involving the applicability of United Nurses & Allied Professionals (Kent Hospital), 367 NLRB No. 94 (2019) (requiring that unions provide non-member objectors with verification that the financial information disclosed to them has been independently audited and that lobbying costs are not chargeable to such… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:46 am by John L. Welch
OMS Investments, Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1031 (TTAB 2010) [precedential]. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  And this Restatement itself acknowledges that ‘[s]ome courts follow the contrary rule. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Justice Perram denied the lowering of the bond sum as well, since no material changes to the case had come about, and therefore a lower bond sum would not be required to be addressed.To bring closure to the case Justice Perram dismissed the entire case with costs, desiring that "[s]ome finality must... be brought to these proceedings".The Dallas Buyers Club case has been going on for some time, with extensive considerations on very nuanced aspects of enforcement by DBC,… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Wen Fa continues an online debate on standing and Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]