Search for: "P. K. Produce, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
Likins, 216 Ariz. 406, 167 P.3d 93 (Arizona Court of Appeals 2007)). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am by Family Law Attorneys
Hardman, 295 Ga. 732, 740 (763 SE2d 861) (2014) (stating that award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9 15 14 might have been appropriate in contempt action if limited to fees party incurred in defending against issue improperly raised in motion for contempt); LabMD, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Scott Van Soye
Anger shifts negotiator focus from resolution to anger-producing event. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:32 am by Schachtman
GE Healthcare Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 FED App. 0258P, 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
” At a hearing in May 2013, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jeffrey K. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:43 am by Jordan Brunner
Tuesday, April 11th at 6:30pm: Nikolas K. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
When using the income and market approaches to value a business, appraisers engaged as expert trial witnesses routinely make "normalizing" adjustments to the income statement (a/k/a Profit & Loss statement or "P&L") before applying a capitalization rate or market value ratios. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
  The employees cashed out their pensions and 401(k) accounts, and invested these proceeds with Citigroup. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm by Marie Louise
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court C D California: For divided infringement, proof of agency not required to establish ‘direction and control’: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
The Calgary Herald argued that sections 4(3)(c) and 4(3)(k) of PIPA meant that PIPA would not apply to these activities. [read post]