Search for: "P. v. Nichols" Results 101 - 120 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by INFORRM
A recent illustration is Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 296 (QB), a libel claim brought by a social worker who had had some responsibility for “Baby P”, Peter Connelly, during his lifetime. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
We can find no clearer statement of judicial antipathy to expert witness advocacy than the famous copyright decision by Judge Learned Hand in Nichols v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya website has a post about the CJEU decision in WS v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Reid explained in that case, at p 1033, Julius v Bishop of Oxford 5 App Cas 214 is itself authority for going behind the words which confer a statutory power to the general scope and objects of the Act in order to find what was intended. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
The Ninth Circuit has concluded that sex-differentiated grooming standards remain permissible after Price Waterhouse, see Jespersen, 444 F.3d at 1109-12; Nichols v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Conley, Bill Conner, Carolyn Conners, Chris Connolly, Michael P. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
“Today, the scarce resource is attention, not programming,” notes Ellen P. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Kuddus v Chief Constable ([2002] 2 AC 122), the highly respected senior Law Lord, Lord Nicholls said “From time to time cases do arise where awards of compensatory damages are perceived as inadequate to achieve a just result between the parties. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am by INFORRM
  The Conservative Manifesto tells us, “We will review and reform libel laws to protect freedom of speech, reduce costs and discourage libel tourism” (Conservative Party Manifesto, p. 90). [read post]