Search for: "PONDER v. THE STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 934
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Jason Rantanen
  The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
The case, Mahanoy Area School District v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 12:38 am by CMS
Background The appellant – KBR, Inc – was a company incorporated in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:30 am
We generally pull a dogeared copy of Wilson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” As I pondered these questions, I remembered a story that I’ve shared with you before. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 4:41 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
He also ponders how individual freedom can hamper good solutions–in this case the use of COVID-19 tracing apps. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]