Search for: "Peck v. Peck" Results 101 - 120 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2018, 7:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were denied in:Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 2:10 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2018-2019update.html Petitions for certiorari were denied in:Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” On the other hand, Adam Peck writes for ThinkProgress that “already anti-women activists are plotting how best to take advantage of a weakened judicial branch in order to undermine access to safe abortions. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:31 pm by Jon Levitan
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Trump v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 5:00 am by Shannon Togawa Mercer, Ashley Deeks
“Artificial Intelligence Could Soon Enhance Real-Time Police Surveillance” reads a recent Wall Street Journal headline. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:10 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Fort Peck Housing Authority v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2017-2018update.html Petition was filed in Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2017-2018update.htmlPetition was filed in Fort Peck Housing Authority, et al., v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Fort Peck Cert Petition Question presented: Whether an action for the restoration of grant in aid funds illegally recouped by the United States constitutes a suit for specific relief such that the United States’ sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This evidence is sufficient for a fact-finder to determine that defendant breached its duty of loyalty to plaintiff, a former client (see Cooke v Laidlaw Adams & Peck, 126 AD2d 453, 456 [1st Dept 1987] [ethical standards applying to the practice of law impose a continuing obligation upon lawyers to refuse employment in matters adversely affecting a client’s interests, even if the client is a former client]). [read post]