Search for: "Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Appeal of"
Results 101 - 120
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2012, 5:03 am
Joseph Schaefer, a New York City police officer, was assigned to assist in the evacuation of Pennsylvania Station. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
In its petition, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania claims the court of appeals erred in granting habeas relief because the court (1) determined only that Pennsylvania courts misapplied state law, as opposed to clearly established federal law; (2) construed accomplice liability in a way that conflicts with Pennsylvania law; and (3) failed to credit evidence favorable to the prosecution and apply the presumption of correctness required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:59 pm
" The Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel held that "the evidence preponderates against the Claims Commission’s finding that the smoke inhalation advanced Employee’s pre-existing bulla emphysema. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm
International Trade Commission confirmed that the ITC has jurisdiction to address trade secret claims, even when the alleged wrongful conduct occurs in a foreign country. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Because of a particular fashioning of most BITs to which India is a Contracting State, allowing for initiation of host State claims there is an impression of vitality of such provisions created. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
The fact that the three Circuit Judges were unanimous in upholding half of District Judge Bolton’s ruling suggests that at least some of the federal government’s preemption claims have considerable legal weight and may be upheld on appeal, even by a conservative U.S. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
Unfortunately for Kowalski, he was not able to begin his professional baseball career as planned in 1943. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Lead Industries Ass’n, 994 F.2d 112, 123 (3d Cir. 1993), one of his first ever PLAC amicus assignments. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the district court decision. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:11 am
Botticella appealed the decision. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
Appeals from a trio of separate cases, including the Philadelphia cases Sehl v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
Appeals from a trio of separate cases, including the Philadelphia cases Sehl v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:04 am
The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s holding that Bimbo was likely to prevail on the merits of its claim of misappropriation of trade secrets under Pennsylvania’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“PUTSA”). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Patentology) USPTO to streamline review of ex parte reexamination appeal briefs (Patent Docs) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:45 pm
Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claim Plan, 686 A.2d 1 (Pa. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
In cross-border disputes this highlights the treatment of pre-contractual fault, and the vexed question of priority between competing assignments of the same debt. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:11 am
., is an accommodation case brought under the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), recently decided by the Third Circuit, which hears appeals from the federal courts of Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to violate the Act by… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Comment: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has long defied easy analysis when it comes to insurance issues. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 4:23 pm
Weekly D2485aContracts -- Specific performance -- Limitation of actions -- Equitable estoppel -- Doctrine of equitable estoppel acts as bar to statute of limitations defense, and its application is wholly independent of statute of limitations and its tolling provisions -- Trial court erred in relying on tolling statute to determine whether plaintiff's claims for specific performance were barred by statute of limitations where plaintiff asserted that defendant was equitably estopped… [read post]
