Search for: "People v Dyson"
Results 101 - 107
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
In the second case (Dyson, Case C-321/03), the question was again not answered: since the transparent dust-collecting bin of a Dyson vacuum cleaner was deemed incapable of being a trade mark, acquired distinctiveness ceased to be in issue. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
Besides IP law, I'm good at spotting trends, connecting people on social networks, fixing things, boiling eggs, and a handful of other things. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
The decision of the Court of Appeal (Lord Woolf CJ, Laws and Dyson LJJ) has proved controversial in part. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Despite their obvious intelligence, capacity for affection, when it comes to toxicology, dogs are not people, although some people act like the less reputable varieties of dogs. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
