Search for: "People v. Ana"
Results 101 - 120
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2017, 6:05 pm
Such was the case in People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
She sought and received a death verdict in People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:23 pm
Will it make much of a difference in the Harris v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Agency Contact: Ana Torres-Davis, Attorney Advisor, National Council on Disability, 1331 F Street, NW, Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 272-2019, e-mail: atorresdavis@ncd.gov. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
In Tobe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:16 pm
The Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:57 pm
The Wednesday ruling in Barnes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
This case may be related to another DME health care fraud case, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 11:45 pm
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
feature=player_embedded&v=wyx6JDQCslE&oref=http%3A%2F%2Fs.ytimg.com%2Fyt%2Fswfbin%2Fwatch_as3-vfl3J-I2Q.swf&has_verified=1COUNTY COURTTop rated as Exceptionally Qualified: Judge Steve Leifman - 54%Judge Andrea Wolfson - 52%Judge Charlie Johnson - 49%Judge Sam Slom - 47% Lowest Percentage of Unqualified votes: Judge Luise Krieger Martin - 5.10%Judge Leifman - 5.35%Judge Slom - 5.41%Judge Johnson - 5.60%Judge Shelly Kravitz - 5.67% Highest Percentage of… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:45 pm
Anyway, getting back on topic, guess what, the Appellate Court Division of the Orange County Superior Court has ruled in the case of People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:21 am
Campbell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:31 am
The Sixth Circuit in Beydoun v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
In response to a 2014 decision from Oregon, Latif v. [read post]
