Search for: "People v. Bower" Results 101 - 120 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 7:55 pm by Brian Huddleston
I think we could legitimately argue that the majority opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Texas, the Court struck down a Texas law that made it a crime for gays and lesbians to have consensual sex in the privacy of their homes, overturning Bowers v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
  At the time, the lower federal courts, heavily influenced by the Supreme Court's 1986 decision upholding the Georgia sodomy law, Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kyle C. Velte
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Bowers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:52 pm by Ilya Somin
But such a defeat could lay the groundwork for a later reversal, much as Bowers v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:05 am by Sally Peat
He quickly calmed our nerves and by the end of the session had us all strutting the room as if we were on stage at the Theatre Royal, bellowing lines from Shakespeare’s Henry V. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am by INFORRM
The case also showed that the courts are willing to award significant damages to people who have had their privacy invaded. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
That meeting, too, had a political agenda, defending gay rights, less than 10 years after the Supreme Court had declared in Bowers v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 4:22 am by SHG
Their opinion started with a quote from a 1986 case, Bowers v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Gay and lesbian students, for instance, may understandably take personally speech that (say) proposes a rejection of same-sex marriage, a return to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in the military, or a return to Bowers v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At that point, the culture war over same-sex marriage had begun in earnest: Goodridge v. [read post]