Search for: "People v. George" Results 101 - 120 of 3,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am by INFORRM
Noyb claim that X used the political and religious views of their users to determine whether people should or should not see an ad campaign by the EU Commission’s Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
However, there are a number of downsides to litigation that pose real problems for the art world: (1) court proceedings are public forums that offer little confidentiality for litigants seeking to protect their reputation; (2) art-related disputes are often internationalized – requiring parties to bring claims in foreign, unfamiliar jurisdictions; (3) court remedies may fail to satisfy non-conventional stakeholders — such as Indigenous peoples — who may seek the return of… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
You cannot expect to utilise AI in your products or services without considering privacy, data protection and how you will safeguard people’s rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am by centerforartlaw
Another significant legal battle involving murals and VARA unfolded in the case of Kerson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
In a judgement of 26 July 2022, Nicklin J held that the defamatory meaning was that the Claimant was a hypocrite who had screwed the country and set a poor moral example to young people ([2022] EWHC 2469 (QB)). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
  They say falsely that on their side they have George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, the three Supreme Court justices who wrote opinions in the 1796 case, Hylton v. [read post]