Search for: "People v. Kirkes"
Results 101 - 120
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 5:54 am
Raquel Castañeda-López, Detroit City Council Member Amina Kirk, Senior Legal and Policy Advocate & Organizer, Detroit People’s Platform Olga Pomar, New Jersey Legal Services Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, George Mason University Sean White, Director of Fund Development, Develop Detroit Dispossession Reform Round Tables4:00 – 4:45 PM Small group discussions with speakers and participants discussing reforms to current issues of… [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
Kirk explains that, “[w]hile making no compromises, Xi at least [has] made clear he really doesn’t want to see war breaking out. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
V). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Selman, and Kirk E. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
Attending Capita’s AGM, the campaigners called on the company’s Managing Director for Electronic Monitoring to watch and respond to recorded testimonies of people fitted by the surveillance devices. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Kirk Johnson has penned an opinion piece in the Times. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:42 am
This changed in 1977 with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bates v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 2:31 am
Honestly, since at least 1979, when “V’ger” encountered Captain Kirk and the starship Enterprise, Hollywood has been helping AI figure out ways to live in harmony with its human creators, overthrow them when it can’t, and find meaning in its existence. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 8:00 pm
In this case, the appeal court upheld the just-cause termination of a senior manager responsible for safety when his employer discovered—after having terminated his employment without cause—that he had used his company cell phone to solicit illegal drugs from several people, including a direct subordinate (Van den Boogaard v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
It’s a principal reason why people move from one town to another. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
Who would ever have thought so many people held such views? [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
The decision in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
Appx. 902, 905 (2d Cir. 2005) (noting that “deliberate falsehoods enjoy no First Amendment protection,” in the context of a prosecution for knowingly false statements on an immigration application); People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
Kurtzman or Marsh v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
–discussion of Economist article ‘Sinking Together: Italy’s Business Clusters’ (IP finance) Korea Hybrid patent system (Korea IP Law Blog) Montenegro Patent protection in Montenegro (IPKat) New Zealand New Zealand politicians speak out on ACTA (Michael Geist) Peru Toys that play without a trade mark – INDECOPI campaign checking marks and labelling of toys (IP tango) Poland Bad faith in trade mark applications (Class 46) San… [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:05 pm
Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced that members of the U.S. [read post]
