Search for: "People v. Lilly"
Results 101 - 120
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
Eli Lilly and Co. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:21 pm
Carlsen v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:26 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 1998 WL 35152135, **3-4 (D. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:27 am
Lilly (No. 05-22-00455-CV), in which the jury found in favor of the plaintiff but awarded her nominal damages. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:10 am
The act overrode the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:54 am
Supreme Court agreed to take the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:23 am
The case was AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm
A white sales rep allegedly complained to the CEO that the employee should not have been hired because “black people did not buy mopeds and ATVs” and that “black people do not ride ATV’s [and] do not come to shows. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
The Supreme People’s Court of China ruling might be a game changer. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
Surrounded by very intelligent people, I have always learned something I needed to know. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly and Co., pp. 12, 26. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
”[13]And it is in no small part thanks to this work of repudiation that more people on the left as well as on the right now recognize the hollowness of liberalism’s pretensions to neutrality. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:18 am
Id. at **6-7 (quoting Lilly v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Less than two years later, Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
The Texas Supreme Court reversed, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Kenya’s anti-counterfeit legislation, India protest (Afro-IP) Cepham – US: CAFC: Another ‘bright-line’ rule from the Federal Circuit; double jeopardy – later developments can overcome double patenting: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) General… [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
