Search for: "People v. Main (1984)"
Results 101 - 120
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
Tuesday’s arguments in Loughrin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
This is an example given in the 1984 deception policy statement: when the first contact is made deceptively, this leads to a violation. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
”[12]Article 100 became Article 53 in the current 1984 version of the Constitution, and the language of the article remained mostly unchanged. [13] Article 53 deals with the duties of the citizens, it does not explicitly provide means for the state to exercise judicial authority. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am
The relevant legal instruments are the Medicines Act 1981 and the Medicines Regulations 1984. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
”) People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
and Cadbury Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
S. 648, 657, n. 21 (1984). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 5:12 am
The case, Zion v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
South Carolina (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
Closed societies encounter terrorism too; it seems a sad reality that people will always find a reason to kill innocent people. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
But one can also look to even more direct precedent, such as the 1984 decision in Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
