Search for: "People v. Mayoral" Results 101 - 120 of 1,033
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2023, 4:44 am by Jack Bogdanski
The people telling the mayor this are apparently pointing to Oregon Revised Statutes section 430.402, which has been on the books in one form or another for 52 years. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Writing a book is a solitary experience, and it is just wonderful to have so many people I admire commenting on my work. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Sewell was convicted of her rape and of indecently assaulting two other people in 2014. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
However, the court found that former mayoral candidate and anti-vaxxer, Mr Johnston continually harassed and defamed AHS employee, Ms Nunn. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:55 pm by Tatiana Venn
During the intervening weeks after Denny’s violent death, Cook County President Toni Preckwinkle and former mayoral candidate and Commissioner Jesus Garcia pushed for the ordinance and rammed it through on September 7, 2011. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Privacy campaigners have called on the Mayor of London to stop the Metropolitan police from being able to access ANPR cameras used by the ULEZ scheme. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
If anything, holding that the statute applies to noise from infill development makes the statute perverse: it would essentially read the statute as encouraging greenfield development far away from people. [read post]