Search for: "People v. Nixon"
Results 101 - 120
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
That presumptive "privilege" is nowhere in the text of the Constitution but the tapes were released, Nixon resigned a few days later, and no political harm was done at the time in the eyes of most academics and judges.The same cannot be said for Nixon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm
Also, it is not clear to me if Judge Kavanaugh does or does not believe U.S. v Nixon (the 8-0 holding that ended Nixon’s presidency, forcing him to provide prosecutors incriminating secretly recorded conversations) was correctly decided.My second general point is a very important process matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am
Ohio, as explained in my brief in Utah v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
I would prefer to think of Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:01 pm
Pro.], and Colorado’s privacy standards (People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:12 pm
See Judy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:08 am
There are multiple, non-textualist precedents that point the other way, however (Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:04 pm
Nixon, 418U.S. 683 (1974). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am
He cited specific black people who had criticized King. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:31 am
Thus, I don't care if a nominee is a liberal or a conservative, or whether he or she supports Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
In State v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am
See, e.g., Wiggins v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
It’s dangerous. . . . people around here are not pros at this sort of thing. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
TrumpThis case was originally titled Tarla Makaeff et al v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 5:47 am
Terry v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
Nixon: We have the privilege of informing you that you ARE a crook My own contribution: @walterolson Bates v. [read post]
