Search for: "People v. Smith (1981)"
Results 101 - 120
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:57 pm
(See Moore v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
People get shot. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1303 (Ala. 1984).California: Carlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
They save people's lives every day - that's their job - and not incidentally they prescribe our clients' products while doing that. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:11 am
The numbers were significant: 47 million people participating in 417,000 plans with approximately $2.5 trillion in assets. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Smith, 904 F.2d 112, 116–17 (1st Cir.1990) (quoting Amen, 831 F.2d at 378) (emphasis supplied). [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
"), people who know the parent can easily find out the child's name. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
Review Bd. (1981), Hobbie v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
The decision is Garber v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
The Kyiv Post was successful in a “libel tourism” case brought by businessman Dimitry Firtash in respect of a story downloaded by 21 people in England. [read post]
