Search for: "People v. White (1980)"
Results 101 - 120
of 348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
Professor Nicoletti tells us that the American Supreme Court would never reverse its Texas v, White decision which had ruled that there was no right to secession. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:55 pm
State numbers vary.In the Foster case, which dates from the 1980s, the prosecutors eliminated people simply because of race. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In New York v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
It did not protect Native Americans, women, slaves, free people of color, or non-white immigrants. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:06 am
Action Ass’n, 615 F.2d 1025 (5th Cir. 1980) (employer could not single out black women for discriminatory treatment; contrary result would undermine Title VII); Shazor v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Ken White does a “lawsplainer” at Popehat that addresses many of the other loose ends that seem to confuse people, and Patterico graciously provides much of the source material and an excellent overview. [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm
Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980) was decided, the majority, consisting of Justices Blackmun, Marshall, Stevens, White, and Brennan considered “special factors” before concluding that a Bivens claim would lie for Eighth Amendment violations. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
It's like a white mountain with Greek columns. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:17 am
This 83-year-old white guy has shown an amazing careerlong commitment to diversity. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
(citing People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
In the aftermath of the Civil War, for example, “[t]hese debtors’ claims and their political success, were cruelly ironic: while Congress endeavored to ‘emancipate’ landed white debtors by allowing them to discharge oppressive debts and maintain their homesteads, the federal government through the Freedmen’s Bureau equated freedom for formerly enslaved people with the ability to enter and fulfill ‘hard contracts’ to farm the land of… [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm
Virginia (1980) (citation omitted); see also First Nat'l Bank of Boston v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:58 am
Five or six people have donated to AASE. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
Cardwell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am
" Two days later, he angrily responded to critics in an impromptu statement at Trump Tower by insisting that protesters on the left were just as much to blame for the violent confrontation as the neo-Nazis and white Supremacists who organized the rally, pointing out there were "very fine people on both sides. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:41 am
In the 1980's, the Nagle family also established CDS Engineers, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Darby and Wickard v. [read post]
