Search for: "People v. White (1980)"
Results 101 - 120
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 12:30 pm
And now they're just sort of waving the white flag. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:05 am
White, 2013 WL 323868 (U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
Regardless of what Stevens was asked during his confirmation hearings, Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
" To further that agenda, the Convention placed nine crimes in §241 of the State's Constitution as bases for disenfranchisement, believing that more Black people would be convicted of those crimes than White people. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
In 1980-1981, when Gill was eight years old, her family moved to Phoenix. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
The decision of R. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:11 am
The decision of R. v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
Professor Nicoletti tells us that the American Supreme Court would never reverse its Texas v, White decision which had ruled that there was no right to secession. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am
The first proposition was reinforced by Kennedy v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:55 pm
State numbers vary.In the Foster case, which dates from the 1980s, the prosecutors eliminated people simply because of race. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
It did not protect Native Americans, women, slaves, free people of color, or non-white immigrants. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:06 am
Action Ass’n, 615 F.2d 1025 (5th Cir. 1980) (employer could not single out black women for discriminatory treatment; contrary result would undermine Title VII); Shazor v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Ken White does a “lawsplainer” at Popehat that addresses many of the other loose ends that seem to confuse people, and Patterico graciously provides much of the source material and an excellent overview. [read post]
16 May 2017, 1:14 pm
Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980) was decided, the majority, consisting of Justices Blackmun, Marshall, Stevens, White, and Brennan considered “special factors” before concluding that a Bivens claim would lie for Eighth Amendment violations. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
It's like a white mountain with Greek columns. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The Statute Restricts Conduct Only When It Is Accompanied by Speech That Conveys a Certain Message Utah bigamy law does not ban married people from having sex with people other than their spouses.[2] It does not ban married people from living with extramarital romantic partners. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 11:17 am
This 83-year-old white guy has shown an amazing careerlong commitment to diversity. [read post]
