Search for: "People v. Williams (1983)" Results 101 - 120 of 272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm by Amy Howe
In recent weeks, his name surfaced as one of several finalists for the job, and in the last ten days he emerged as the frontrunner, as the stock of another frontrunner, Judge William Pryor of the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, seemed to fall. [read post]
Williams, 462 A.2d 491, 492 (Me. 1983)(“An offer of proof must not only detail the proposed [evidence] but must also support the admissibility of that [evidence]. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Abortion Although Gruender, unlike Judge William Pryor of the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am by Tejinder Singh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then Chief Justice William Rehnquist on the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
This led to an occupation of the site by members of the tribe, with 222 people eventually evicted by police after 506 days. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The response from lawyers was little different than in 1983. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
Hoffman, supra.The court wnet on to outline the legal issues in the case and the standard it would apply in analyzing those issues:The Fourth Amendment protects the people against unreasonable searches and seizures and provides that warrants shall not be issued absent probable cause. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am by SHG
§ 1983 is meant to provide. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Rand by William Kaplan A Trying Question: The Jury in Nineteenth Centre Canada by R. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:21 am by Kelly Buchanan
This issue haunted the courts until 1983, when the case of R v Williams came before the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
”  Hirshman repeatedly describes O’Connor’s opinions on the Court as “tightfisted,” and she laments that, “[o]f all the hurdles the states thought up to discourage women in the years from her first abortion decision in 1983 to [Planned Parenthood v.] [read post]