Search for: "Person v. Davis et al" Results 101 - 120 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors  v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
This post examines an issue that arose in the case of Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
 Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The sad truth is that the persistence of interpreting science by personal charm, credibility, and political correctness of scientists’ personality remains as a legacy of our authority-based approach to knowledge. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) before adopting an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a)? [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Equustek Solutions Inc. v Jack et al, 2014 BCSC 1063) the British Columbia Supreme Court has issued an interim third party injunction against Google, ordering it to stop indexing or referencing certain websites in its search results, not just in Canada but everywhere. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Offensive to a Reasonable Person: Publication of the private facts in question must be offensive to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities.4. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am by Peter Tillers
Faigman, et al., Modern Scientific Evidence: Standards, Statistics, and Research Methods v (2008 student ed.). [read post]