Search for: "Peterson v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 8:33 pm
But the Sixth Circuit disagreed, relying on the two components of the "mandate rule" from United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
*** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECivil Action No. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
*** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARECivil Action No. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:29 am
It turns out that there is an ancient rule, dating to an 1872 case called United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:07 pm
Cunningham’s then abrupt departure from the United States to Japan, Mrs. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm
In the 2004 case Peterson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
United States,504 F. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
Quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Peterson, CFLS A November, 2016 appellate decision in California (Cassinelli), coupled with a May, 2017 United States Supreme Court decision (Howell), seemingly forecloses all meaningful enforcement avenues in California for aggrieved spouses of former military members whose divided share of community military pension benefits has been diluted or eliminated by the latter party’s unilateral, extra-judicial election to receive VA disability benefits (thereby… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:40 am
”Hendrickson v United Parcel Service, DOCKET NO. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 2:01 pm
Peterson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 pm
The story is told in: Ross Thomson, Structures of Change in the Mechanical Age: Technological Innovation in the United States 1790-1865 (2009); Alexander Rose, American Rifle: A Biography (2008); David R. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Like Martin, Peterson also explained the difference between forensic interviews and other types of interviews. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court summarily affirmed the decision of a Three Judge Panel of the U.S. [read post]
