Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am by JB
City of New London, in which the United States Supreme Court held that New London could use eminent domain to transfer land to private developers for the purpose of stimulating economic development. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:29 am
Wyeth, which is being acquired by Pfizer Inc., has said that it faces more than 9,000 lawsuits over its menopause drugs, along with Pfizer's Pharmacia & Upjohn unit. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Matthew Scarola
The Court declined to grant certiorari in Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
In a crushing blow to consumers, on Thursday, February 21st, the United States Supreme Court again sided with big pharmaceutical medical device makers. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
GCC International Limited, et al. (11/16/2007, non-precedential): appeal from grant of preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from "making, using, offering for sale, or selling in the United States, or importing into the United States, any product that falls within the scope of claim 58 of U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:17 pm by Paul Lyons
  In particular, NWC briefs have addressed compelling legal issues to prevent attempts to weaken the False Claims Act (FCA) before the United States Supreme Court in cases like State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]