Search for: "Phillips v. USA" Results 101 - 120 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Finding that none of defendant's claims have merit, we affirm the the district court's judgment. 08a0012p.06 USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 6:18 am by James Romoser
Fish and Wildlife Services v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
News), Richard Wolf of USA Today, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Bob Barnes and Amber Phillips of The Washington Post, and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In the Texas Lawyer (subscription or registration required), Miriam Rozen reports on last week’s decision in Commil USA v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 10:20 am by Dennis Crouch
These do not rise to the level of ‘disclaimer’ but we’re never entirely sure whether the specification-forward approach of Phillips v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf cites two upcoming Supreme Court cases, Husted v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
”    At USA Today, Joan Biskupic has an interview with Justice Ginsburg, who – among other things – expresses the belief that the majority’s decision in Connick v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
Meanwhile, in the Privy Council Lords Phillips, Mance, Clarke, and Hamilton (Scotland) and Sir Henry Brooke will hear the following cases: Rhett Allen Fuller v The Attorney General of Belize from Monday 11 to Tuesday 12 April 2011. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Christie v. [read post]
Particularly, Commissioner Chopra asserted that Commissioners Phillips and Wilson “do not support serious consequences for Made in USA fraud and have expressed support for the longstanding permissive policy of the past,” including support for “no-money, no-fault settlements. [read post]