Search for: "Providence Construction Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 3,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 10:09 am by Liskow & Lewis
Although EPA and the Corps have previously issued guidance interpreting SWANCC and Rapanos (EPA’s earlier guidance on Rapanos is discussed at www.theenergylawblog.com/2007/07/articles/environmental/epa-and-army-corps-of-engineers-publish-joint-guidance/ ), the agencies believe “previous guidance did not make full use of the authority provided by the CWA to include waters within the scope of the Act, as interpreted by the Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:00 pm by Jeff Lorenzo
  The NAHB says the Permit 46 illegally expands the Corps' jurisdiction to upland ditches and that the Corps failed to explain or provide a reasoned basis for its assertion of jurisdiction in the permit. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court explains that the case involves the scope of the duty imposed on the Army Corps of Engineers by section 404 of the Clean Water Act and its implementing regulations, to protect wetlands that contain or are covered by waters of the United States (and so are within Federal jurisdiction) from environmental degradation by caused by the construction of a highway. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:30 am
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on the parameters of additional insured coverage called Suffolk Construction Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Wally Zimolong
   In light of the challenges to PENNDOT’s “Innovative Bidding” procedures in Brayman Construction Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:04 am by John Jenkins
Further,providing constructive feedback to the external auditor may improve audit quality and enhance the relationship between the audit committee and the external auditor. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:35 am by Altman & Altman
According to the National Trial Lawyers and court documents, a Common Pleas Court from Allegheny County, PA, found Lane Construction Corp. of CT liable for $15.8 million in damages to Gump-Schragl’s family. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:35 pm by Adam Bednar
The fist phase of the project — a joint venture between La Cité Development and BRP Development Corp. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:41 am by drdiekman
Corp., NY Slip Op 01988 (2d Dept. 2011). [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp., Novartis seems to have come out on top, to the disappointment of plaintiff, Frank Maldonado, thanks to an unusually harsh application of the concept of constructive notice. [read post]