Search for: "Public Serv. Corp. v. Public Serv. Comm." Results 101 - 120 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
In response to an email inquiry from a non-sponsor seeking clarification of the rules regarding whether it would be permissible for her to “discuss the Olympics…on social media,” the USOC informed her: [U]nless a company or organization’s primary business is disseminating news and information, the company’s social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, SnapChat, Instagram, etc.) are commercial in nature, serving to promote the company or brand; to raise the… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2006); Sandt, 264 F.3d at1350–51; Finnigan Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:30 am by Terry Hart
 But it was most direct in Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Generally, however, public employees may assert official immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority. [read post]