Search for: "R.C." Results 101 - 120 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
  But R.C. 2923.13, the weapons-under-disability statute, provides a number of different disability conditions, a juvenile adjudication being one, and R.C. 2923.13(A)(2), the juvenile adjudication provision, does not use juvenile adjudications as sentence enhancements. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:57 am by MBettman
Pursuant to the current version of R.C. 2503.33, effective March 22, 2013, “The chief justice and the judges of the supreme court shall meet at Columbus in January of each year and at subsequent times throughout the year as determined by the court. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:47 am
Bd. of Revision, 141 Ohio St.3d 243, 2014-Ohio-4723, 23 N.E.3d 1086…, it is easy to surmise that R.C. 5713.04 is more clarification of, than exception to R.C. 5713.03. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:55 am
"The appellant did not dispute that its lease did not comply with R.C. 5301.01, but argued that the formalities of R.C. 5301.08exempts the lease from the formal execution requirements. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
We are persuaded that the legislature's action in amending R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) was not whimsy, but a deliberate effort to limit political subdivisions' liability for injuries and deaths on their roadways. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:46 am by Employment Services
Myers Company (2012-Ohio-5317) that substantially limits the definition of “deliberate removal of an equipment safety guard” necessary to create a rebuttable presumption of intent under Ohio’s Employer Intentional Tort Statute, R.C. 2745.01(C). [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:01 pm
Former R.C. 5713.03 required a county auditor to consider a recent arm’s-length sale in determining a property’s true value for real property tax purposes. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:06 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a plaintiff may, in the same case, pursue claims for dog bite injury under both the state’s specific dog bite statute, R.C. 955.28, and common law negligence. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that the preadoption placement procedures for “private” adoptions set forth in R.C. 5103.16(D) must be followed even in cases where the child has been living with the prospective adoptive parents pursuant to an award of legal custody by a juvenile court. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 6:36 pm by Tony
H.B 523 the Medical Marijuana Control Program, specifically speak to the Rights of Employer at R.C. 3796.28. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:20 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in order to correct criminal sentences that do not properly impose a term of post-release control, the state’s trial courts: 1) must conduct de novo sentencing hearings for offenders who were sentenced before July 11, 2006; and 2) must follow statutory resentencing procedures set forth in R.C. 2929.191 for offenders whose sentences were imposed on or after July 11, 2006, the effective date of the statute. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:46 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that R.C. 2953.08(D)(1), which bars a criminal defendant from appealing a jointly recommended sentence that is “authorized by law,” does not bar appellate review in cases where the sentence imposed by a trial court is contrary to a mandatory provision of the state’s criminal sentencing statutes. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:17 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that the damaging of a single private telephone or cellular telephone disrupts public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04(A)(3) if the conduct substantially impairs the ability of law-enforcement officers, firefighters, rescue personnel, emergency-medical-services personnel, or emergency-facility personnel to respond to an emergency or to protect and preserve any person or property from serious physical harm. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:03 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether R.C. 2953.08(D)(3) is unconstitutional on its face, and as applied to … Continue reading → The post Oral Argument Preview: Is it Constitutional for A Life-Without-Parole Sentence for Aggravated Murder to be Nonreviewable? [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 3:23 pm
In a decision announced today, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that when the state seeks to elevate the level of a current domestic violence charge against a defendant based on that person’s prior conviction(s) for domestic violence: 1) Submitting a judgment entry of conviction from a court journal pursuant to R.C. 2945.75(B)(1) is not the exclusive means by which the state may validly prove a prior conviction. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:05 pm
When the owner of farm land who has obtained a current agricultural use valuation (CAUV) of his property petitions to detach that land from a municipality under R.C. 709.42, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a court considering the detachment petition must determine the amount of property taxes the owner “is taxed and will continue to be taxed” based on the CAUV of the land rather than the tax the owner would pay based on the non-agricultural market value of the… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:29 am
The state's allied offenses of similar import statute (R.C. 2941.25), therefore, does not require the firearm specification and [read post]