Search for: "Reason v. General Motors Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 666
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2019, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
General Motors Corp., 111 N.J. 238, 544 A.2d 357 (1988) (holding that a strict liability claim against General Motors for an unreasonably dangerous product defect was subject to apportionment for contribution from failing to wear a seat belt) (the jury’s right to apportion furthered the public policy of properly allocating the costs of accidents and injuries). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
Because of the rarity of such legislative intent, the Federal Rule generally preempts predecessor statutes.2 In Southern Natural Gas Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Detroit,3 the Michigan Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the taking of private property for the construction of a General Motors automotive plant. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
General Court Rules Article 10, § 2 of the 1963 Constitution requires that “compensation shall be determined in proceedings in the court of record. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
Ford Motor Co., 491 F. 3d 381, 390 (CA8 2007); Virginia Atlantic Airways Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
For contractual attorney’s fees, an award of attorney’s fees is generally considered mandatory, meaning that the Court must determine a winner and a loser and the Court must award the prevailing party a reasonable attorney’s fee. [read post]