Search for: "Regan v. Regan" Results 101 - 120 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, "[t]he board correctly determined that [Police Officer's] injury was not caused by an accident as defined in the New York City Administrative Code and applicable case law.Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Department of City of New York, 57 NY2d 1010, the Appellate Division observed that "not every line-of-duty injury will support an award of accidental disability retirement [and] an injury which occurs without an… [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Forfeiture of employee's retirement contributions made to a New York State public retirement system United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
The employee was injured during a lunch break [Nappi v Regan, 186 AD2d 855]; and 3. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court decision in Egbert v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 President Regan's appointment of Justice Anthony Kennedy, the centrist on the current SCOTUS, is the most notable example of recent decades.Not so with Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
"Finding that "substantial evidence supports a finding that [Booth's] injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment," the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's determination.In contrast, in Beachy v Regan, 119 AD2d 967, the court ruled that a back injury suffered during practice for an employer-sponsored tug-of-war contest while the employee was "on regular pay" was a work-related for the purposes of eligibility for accidental… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
The Fourth Estate Decision and Copyright Registration — US Copyright Office General Counsel Regan Smith dives into the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit v Wall-street.com, which held that the Copyright Act requires copyright owners to have a registration certificate from the Copyright Office (or have had their application refused by the Office) before filing suit for infringment. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
”Finding that “substantial evidence supports a finding that [Booth’s] injury did not arise out of and in the course of his employment,” the Appellate Division affirmed the Board's determination.In contrast, in Beachy v Regan, 119 AD2d 967, the court ruled that a back injury suffered during practice for an employer-sponsored tug-of-war contest while the employee was “on regular pay” was a work-related for the purposes of eligibility for… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by James Bickford
  He criticizes the Court’s treatment of its precedent, arguing that that “one cannot make any claim to intellectual coherence if one invokes the distinction between ‘subsidies’ and ‘penalties’ in one case (Regan v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:43 am by Amanda Pickens
April 11, 2016) (action filed to enjoin merger of grocery chains, alleging – inter alia – deficiencies in proxy materials) Regan, et. al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]