Search for: "Ricci v. DeStefano"
Results 101 - 120
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 8:12 am
(If you were on a panel at SEALS and want to coordinate collating some or all of your co-panelists' notes, please do so and send me an email and there'll be a post just like this one.)The Supreme Court's decision in Ricci v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:14 pm
Kamp (The John Marshall Law School) has posted Ricci v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:12 am
This is the kind of case that could dominate a Circuit judge's Supreme Court nomination, much like Ricci v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
On abortion, for instance, Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
By Mike Dorf Last year, in Ricci v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:22 pm
DeStefano. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:04 pm
City of Chicago and Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:31 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court decided Ricci v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court decided Ricci v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:23 pm
” (workersxzcompxzkit) The Supreme Court also noted that their opinion may cause problems for employers and employees when the situation is reversed, such as in Ricci v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:55 pm
After all, they were minority firefighters alleging claims of disparate impact discrimination based on the City of Chicago’s use of the results of a performance exam—almost the mirror image of Ricci v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:23 pm
By Mike Dorf Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Lewis v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:51 am
Citing its recent opinion in another firefighter test case—Ricci v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
In Ricci v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:15 am
Recall that the Supreme Court in another Connecticut case, Ricci v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:54 am
A cryptic passage at the end of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:05 pm
For example, the Court in Ricci v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:29 pm
Did last year's high court decision quietly create a new defense for employers to disparate impact claims? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:08 pm
Professor Secunda calls it a "very worthwhile read among the increasing literature on this watershed case [Ricci v. [read post]
