Search for: "Ronald J. Allen"
Results 101 - 120
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Freel, Austin Melissa Lee Hargis, Austin Steven J. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Freel, Austin Melissa Lee Hargis, Austin Steven J. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
12 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), ... 4. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
-J. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:21 am
Wasserstein, Allen L. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
Biographical details about panelists (listed in alphabetical order): Ronald J. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:14 pm
Biographical details about panelists (listed in alphabetical order): Ronald J. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
Biographical details about panelists (listed in alphabetical order): Ronald J. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Allen, ___ F. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
Allen Co. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Ronald E. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:53 am
” Given the unqualified use of the collective first person pronoun in the same paragraph that refers to the ASA, combined with Ronald Wasserstein’s official capacity, and the complete absence of a disclaimer that this pronouncement was simply a personal opinion, a reasonable reader could hardly avoid concluding that this pronouncement reflected ASA policy. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In 1989, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit resolved an appeal involving expert witnesses who relied upon epidemiologic studies by concluding that it did not have to resolve questions of bias and confounding because the studies relied upon had presented their results with confidence intervals.[4] Judges and expert witnesses persistently interpreted single confidence intervals from one study as having a 95 percent probability of containing the actual parameter.[5]… [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Ronald D. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
John J. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 12:41 pm
— Timothy J. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
See Ronald J. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 8:48 am
• Ronald J. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
Lawrence J. [read post]
