Search for: "S. H. V. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 8:49 am
USCIS regulations state that employers are required to file an H-1B amendment on an employee’s behalf if any “material change” occurs to the employee’s current authorized employment. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:13 am
’ United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
Unfortunately, USCIS’s policy of using the DFF to protect a child’s age seems only to pertain to individuals who apply for adjustment of status within the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
The most recent development in the fight over ICWA is Brackeen v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
Barr, together with me and B.U. law professor Gary Lawson, and with Citizens United, joined an amicus brief that was filed yesterday on Donald Trump's side in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
[…] Considerations should include the student’s present intent, not what they might do after a lengthy stay in the United States”. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Bain Capital Private Equity et al – United States District Court – Western District of Tennessee – January 9th, 2024) involves a class action complaint filed by members of the defendant’s cheerleading camps. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm
Removing a Juror for Cause The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed…. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
United States, 139 S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
United States Postal Service (2019)"; "Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court’s Sackett v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:56 am
V; Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Chief Judge Daniel H. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
As a follow-up to last year’s blog on United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
For example, in Everson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Milwaukee I's logic effectively decides the merits in favor of the defendants in API v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
