Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 101 - 120
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2006, 6:41 am
DataQuick Information Systems, Inc., 237 F.R.D. 561 (D. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 10:23 am
,Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
HJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HT v Same ú [2010] UKSC 31; [2010] WLR (D) 174 “To reject a gay person’s claim for refugee status on the ground that, if returned to his home country, he could avoid persecution by living discreetly would be to deny his right, protected by the 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, to live freely and openly as himself without fear of persecution. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 12:48 pm
S. 725, 733 (1993) (quoting Johnson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:15 am
William D. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 12:24 pm
Li v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
In this article, we will discuss resentencing pursuant to Penal Code 1170(d) in context of the court’s decision in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:09 am
Agler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
R v Kousar [2008]; [2009] WLR (D) 16 “A wife who shared the matrimonial home with her husband, whom she knew was storing merchandise from his business at home, but acquiesced in it being there and did not demand he remove it, was not in control or possession of the goods within the meaning of s [...] [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:33 am
Doleman v Shaw [2009] EWCA Civ 283; [2009] WLR (D) 115 “On a true construction of s 178(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986, on the disclaimer of a lease by a liquidator, although the company ceased to be bound by the tenant covenants so far as its own obligations were concerned, it was treated as still [...] [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:24 am
R v Downer [2009] EWCA Crim 1361; [2009] WLR (D) 233 “The offence of aggravated burglary under s 10 (1) of the Theft Act 1968 was not to be regarded as an indivisible offence and, in order to find out what constituted a burglary, it was essential to have regard to the two types of burglary [...] [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 5:58 am
Stock analyzing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Kucana v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:17 pm
D. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:27 pm
But here's the kicker - Scalia then quotes Arizona v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
Here, D's car hits V's car. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 10:15 pm
Les échéanciers de Legifrance Quand il veut vérifier rapidement si un décret d'application de tel article d'une réforme législative a bien été pris, le juriste, s'il a été bien formé , aura tendance à utiliser l'échéancier des décrets (...) [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:29 am
Atkinson v Supreme Court of Cyprus; Binnington v Supreme Court of Cyprus [2009] WLR (D) 193 “A trial was the legal process whereby guilt or innocence was to be decided and which resulted in a final determination. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
Moran v Manchester City Council; Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378; [2008] WLR (D) 112 “A women's refuge was accommodation which, having regard to various factors, it could be reasonable for women to continue to occupy. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:38 am
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc., 481 F.Supp.2d 439 (D. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:30 am
Generics (UK) Ltd and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] WLR (D) 68 “A claim for revocation on the ground of insufficiency of a patent in which claims 1 and 3 were to a product consisting of a single chemical compound and claim 6 was to a process for preparing it failed. [read post]
