Search for: "S.A. V. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 1,408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, ISS Securities Class Action Services and the FOX Williams law jointly report on the current state of play in European Class Actions. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am by Jeremy C. King
” Put differently, if the one doing the copying believes the customer won’t fall for the fake without a label, the product design likely does not rise to the level of trade dress. [1] Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:06 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
Ct. 2392, 2425, 2427 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Hustler Mag., Inc., 465 U.S. 770, 774 (1984); and then quoting Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank National Association v Moss, 186 AD3d 1753, 1753 [2d Dept 2020]; State v Winkle, 179 AD3d 1121, 1126 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:05 am by Russell Knight
S.A, 178 Ill. 2d 551, 561 (Ill. 1997) “Illinois recognizes a general duty to disclose. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Stephen J. Finley, Jr.
The appeal in Mallory required the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to consider whether Pennsylvania’s broad exercise of personal jurisdiction through its corporate registration statute comports with the demands of due process as applied by the United States Supreme Court in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:43 am by Stephen J. Finley, Jr.
The appeal in Mallory required the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to consider whether Pennsylvania’s broad exercise of personal jurisdiction through its corporate registration statute comports with the demands of due process as applied by the United States Supreme Court in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]