Search for: "SEALED PETITIONER 1"
Results 101 - 120
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
"[A] petitioner may have standing by virtue of who petitioner is, that is, its identity. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:51 pm
The NVC will send it to the U.S. embassy or consulate where the fiancé will apply for a K-1 visa. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:20 am
But a conviction for this felony offense cannot be expunged or sealed. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Second, mirroring the statute governing sealing, but extending the relevant waiting periods, the statute permitted a petitioner to expunge his or her entire juvenile record, if the petitioner met a five-part test, including that five years had elapsed since discharge from custody or supervision and the petitioner had not committed a crime or offense or been adjudged a delinquent or in need of supervision for five years. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:36 am
App. 537, 539 n.1 (2014). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
Janet Napolitano, et al. - Petitioners' Opposition To Respondents' Motion For Leave To File Sealed Ex Parte Supplemental Appendix[By: Electronic Privacy Information Center |In: Civil Procedure & Remedies]5. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted petitioner’s application. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
Minnesota Statutes 609.748(a)(1). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
” Now, Petitioner’s counsel, the Center for Constitutional Rights, desires to file a sealed classified declaration in Center for Constitutional Rights v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Although FCA claims must be filed “in camera” and remain under seal for sixty days, State Farm alleges that the claim adjusters’ attorneys violated the seal to “fuel a media campaign designed to demonize and put pressure on State Farm to settle. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Sealed Packet - Do Not Open Consular Officer will give you your passport(s) containing the K-1 visa (K-2) and a sealed packet containing the civil documents you provided, plus other documents prepared by the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
The hearing on September 27th at 1 PM in the Grote v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
WETLANDS 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Mason, Case No. 1:96-cv-02319-SMO, Slip op. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:08 pm
Meanwhile, Just Label It advises consumers who want to avoid bioengineered foods to “[l]ook for the USDA Organic seal and buy organic – The National Organic Standards prohibit the use of genetic engineering. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:15 am
The aspect of the IPR/PGR estoppel that applies to USPTO proceedings is codified below: 315 (e)(1) Estoppel (applies to IPR; 325(e)(1) codifies the same for PGR & TPCBMP) PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE- The petitioner in an inter partes review of a claim in a patent under this chapter that results in a final written decision under section 318(a), or the real party in interest or privy of the petitioner, may not request or maintain a proceeding before the… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
DWR’s standards at issue include requirements that all wells: (1) “be located an adequate horizontal distance” from sources of contamination, including suggested distances for certain common types of sources; (2) “where possible…be located up the groundwater gradient from sources of contamination”; (3) “if possible…located outside areas of flooding; and (4) “annular space” is “effectively sealed” and… [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:16 pm
A New York Family Lawyer said the petitioner having applied to this Court for an Order directing DH (the "Patient"), a patient at Nassau University Medical Center (the "Medical Center"), to show cause why an Order should not be granted authorizing or discontinuing medical treatment for the Patient as set forth in the petition and this application having come on to be heard before the undersigned, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau,… [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:43 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with some comments by Eric] In re: sec. 2703(d) Order; 10GJ3793; Miscellaneous Case No. 1:11dm00003 (E.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:12 pm
Superior Court: (1) Was the order compelling a mental examination of petitioner under Penal Code section 1054.3, subdivision (b), reviewable by pretrial writ? [read post]
